Patient Related Outcome Measures (Nov 2023)
Qualitative Exploration in Exit Interviews of Changes Observed in Clinical Trials for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder Without Intellectual Disability
Abstract
Michael Chladek,1 Claire Burbridge,2 Elizabeth Gibbons,2 Tom Willgoss,3 Janice Smith,4 Susanne Clinch3 1Clinical Outcome Assessments, Clinical Outcomes Solutions LLC, Chicago, IL, USA; 2Clinical Outcome Assessments, Clinical Outcomes Solutions Ltd, Folkestone, Kent, UK; 3Patient Centered Outcomes Research, Roche Products Ltd, Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire, UK; 4Global Development, Roche Products Ltd, Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire, UKCorrespondence: Susanne Clinch, Patient Centered Outcomes Research, Roche Products Ltd, 6 Falcon Way, Shire Park, Welwyn Garden City, AL71TW, UK, Email [email protected]: To explore, from the perspective of Study Partners (SPs; eg, caregivers) of clinical trial participants with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), any changes experienced in socialization and communication over the clinical trial, how these changes manifested, and the impact these changes had on the autistic individual, the SP, and family. This helps interpret whether changes in trial outcomes were meaningful.Patients and Methods: Interviews were conducted with the SPs of individuals with ASD, without intellectual disability, from 2 clinical trials: 86 children (aged 5– 12 years) or adolescents (aged 13– 17 years) who took part in the aV1ation trial (83.7% male), and 41 adults (aged 18+ years) who took part in the V1aduct trial (80.5% male). The primary endpoint for both trials was change from baseline in the VinelandTM-II two-domain composite, consisting of the mean of the Socialization and Communication domains. In these interviews the participants verbally indicated level of change for each of these key domains on 7-point change scales.Results: Improvements in the Socialization domain enabled greater awareness of the feelings of others and allowed for stronger empathy and kindness. Improvements in the Communication domain allowed for the autistic individual to be better at listening and better at self-expression. Together, changes in these two domains, which were considered most important, allowed for richer, deeper relationships. Study Partners noted that improvements in these domains allowed for better integration within the family unit, decreased stress, and increased optimism about the autistic individual’s future.Conclusions: The impacts of changes in either domain were synergistic, combining together to create positive experiences which in turn led to further positive impacts in other skills. These qualitative insights provide context to the changes that were observed during the clinical trial and captured using the VinelandTM-II, illustrating the meaning of these changes to the individuals with ASD without intellectual disability and their families, and the impact that they have on people’s everyday lives and overall health-related quality of life.Keywords: Autism, VinelandTM-II, ASD, socialization, communication, meaningful change, qualitative, interview
