Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment (Nov 2021)

Cardiac Dose Control and Optimization Strategy for Left Breast Cancer Radiotherapy With Non-Uniform VMAT Technology

  • Jianjian Qiu PhD,
  • Shujun Zhang MS,
  • Bo Lv MS,
  • Xiangpeng Zheng MD

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15330338211053752
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 20

Abstract

Read online

Purpose: A novel in-house technology “Non-Uniform VMAT (NU-VMAT)” was developed for automated cardiac dose reduction and treatment planning optimization in the left breast radiotherapy. Methods: The NU-VMAT model based on I GM (gantry MLC Movement coefficient index) was established to optimize the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) MLC movement and modulation intensity in certain gantry angles. The ESAPI embedded in Eclipse® was employed to connect TPS and the optimization program via I/O relevant DICOM RT files. The adjuvant whole-breast radiotherapy of 14 patients with left breast cancer was replanned using our NU-VMAT technology in comparison with VMAT and IMRT technology. Dosimetric parameters including D 1% , D 99% , and D mean of PTV, V 5 , V 10 , and V 20 of ipisilateral lung, V 5 , D 20 , D 30 , and D mean of heart, monitor units (MUs), and delivery time derived from IMRT, VMAT, and NU-VMAT plans were evaluated for plan quality and delivery efficiency. The quality assurance (QA) was conducted using both point-dose and planar-dose measurements for all treatment plans. Results: The I GM−NU−VMAT curves with plan optimization (range from 50% to 147%) were converged more significantly than I GM - VMAT curves (range from 0% to 297%). The dose distribution requirements of the target and normal tissues could be met using IMRT, VMAT, or NU-VMAT; the lowest D mean was achieved in NU-VMAT plans (5.38 ± 0.46 Gy vs 5.63 ± 0.61 Gy in IMRT and 7.95 ± 0.52 Gy in VMAT plans). Statistically significant differences were found in terms of delivery time and MU when comparing IMRT with VMAT and NU-VMAT plans ( P < .05). In comparison with IMRT plans, the MU and delivery time in NU-VMAT plans dramatically decreased by 69.8% and 28.4%, respectively. Moreover, NU-VMAT plans showed a high gamma passing rate (96.5% ± 1.11) in plane dose verification and minimal dose difference (2.4% ± 0.19) in point absolute dose verification. Conclusion: Our non-uniform VMAT facilitated the treatment strategy optimization for left breast cancer radiotherapy with dosimetric advantage in cardiac dose reduction and delivery efficiency in comparison with the conventional VMAT and IMRT.