Cancer Medicine (Aug 2024)

Mechanism and rational combinations with GP‐2250, a novel oxathiazine derivative, in ovarian cancer

  • Mark S. Kim,
  • Deanna Glassman,
  • Katelyn F. Handley,
  • Adrian Lankenau Ahumada,
  • Nicholas B. Jennings,
  • Emine Bayraktar,
  • Katherine Foster,
  • Robiya Joseph,
  • Sanghoon Lee,
  • Robert L. Coleman,
  • Anil K. Sood

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.70031
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 15
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background GP‐2250, a novel analog of taurultam (TRLT), has emerged as a potent anti‐neoplastic drug; however, the mechanisms underlying its effects are not well understood. Here, we investigated the mechanism of action and the biological effects of GP‐2250 using in vitro and in vivo models. Methods We carried out a series of in vitro (MTT assay, Annexin V/PI assay, colony formation assay, reverse‐phase protein array [RPPA], and HRLC/IC analysis) to determine the biological activity of GP‐2250 and investigate the mechanism of action. In vivo experiments were carried out to determine the therapeutic efficacy of GP‐2250 alone and in combination with standard‐of‐care drugs (e.g., paclitaxel, cisplatin, topotecan, and poly ADP‐ribose polymerase [PARP] inhibitors). Results We investigated the cytotoxic effect of GP‐2250 in 10 ovarian cancer cell lines and found GP‐2250 combined with a PARP inhibitor had the greatest synergy. RPPA revealed that GP‐2250 inhibited hypoxia‐inducible factor‐1α, AKT, and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) activation and expression. High‐resolution mass spectrometry revealed that hexokinase2 activity and protein expression were significantly reduced by GP‐2250 exposure. Furthermore, GP‐2250 reduced glycolysis and ATP synthesis in cancer cells. An in vivo pharmacodynamic experiment using the OVCAR8 mouse model demonstrated that 500 mg/kg GP‐2250 was effective in downregulating AKT and mTOR activation and expression. In the in vivo therapy experiment using an orthotopic mouse model, a combination of GP‐2250 with either PARP inhibitors or bevacizumab showed a significant reduction of tumor weights and nodules compared to those treated with a vehicle, control IgG groups, or monotherapy groups. Conclusions Taken together, our data indicate that GP‐2250 exerts profound effects on tumor metabolism and, in combination with PARP inhibitors or bevacizumab, showed promising anti‐tumor efficacy. These findings could have implications for the clinical development of GP‐2250.

Keywords