Immunological Medicine (Jan 2019)

Multicenter, observational clinical study of abatacept in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis

  • Noriyoshi Ogawa,
  • Hiroyuki Ohashi,
  • Yasuhiro Ota,
  • Kaori Kobori,
  • Motohiro Suzuki,
  • Seiji Tsuboi,
  • Masakatsu Hayakawa,
  • Yoshinori Goto,
  • Taro Karahashi,
  • Osamu Kimoto,
  • Toshiaki Miyamoto,
  • Shogo Furukawa,
  • Kumiko Shimoyama,
  • Daisuke Suzuki,
  • Yuichiro Maekawa

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/25785826.2019.1605036
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 42, no. 1
pp. 29 – 38

Abstract

Read online

The aim of this study was to assess abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patient. Patients (20 men, 89 women, aged 61.9 ± 10.4 y) who responded inadequately to conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug were treated with abatacept for 24-months. Disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28-CRP) was evaluated. Of 109 patients, 82 (75.2%) were on methotrexate (MTX; mean dosage 9.0 ± 2.7 mg/week); 48 (44.0%) were naive to biologics and 61 (56.0%) had failed biologics. The 1- and 2-year retention rates were 77% and 53%, respectively. At 24-months, the DAS28-CRP remission rates were 62.8% in the biologic-naïve patients, and 33.3% in the biologic-failure patients (p < .01), while the structural remission rates were 83.9% and 73.1%, respectively (p = .461). Abatacept was equally effective in RA patients who were and were not on concomitant MTX. Biologic-naïve was associated with better clinical outcome. Abatacept was effective in patients who showed decreasing anti-CCP antibody titers or serum MMP-3 levels during treatment. Infection was the most frequent adverse effect of abatacept therapy. In conclusion, abatacept is more effective in biologic-naïve than in biologic-failure RA patients with or without concomitant use of MTX. Abatacept is more effective in RA patients with than without decreasing serum MMP-3 or anti-CCP antibody titers during treatment.

Keywords