Frontiers in Nutrition (Jan 2024)

Ultra-processed food consumption and metabolic disease risk: an umbrella review of systematic reviews with meta-analyses of observational studies

  • Jia-Le Lv,
  • Jia-Le Lv,
  • Jia-Le Lv,
  • Yi-Fan Wei,
  • Yi-Fan Wei,
  • Yi-Fan Wei,
  • Jia-Nan Sun,
  • Yu-Chen Shi,
  • Fang-Hua Liu,
  • Fang-Hua Liu,
  • Fang-Hua Liu,
  • Ming-Hui Sun,
  • Ming-Hui Sun,
  • Ming-Hui Sun,
  • Qing Chang,
  • Qing Chang,
  • Qing Chang,
  • Qi-Jun Wu,
  • Qi-Jun Wu,
  • Qi-Jun Wu,
  • Qi-Jun Wu,
  • Yu-Hong Zhao,
  • Yu-Hong Zhao,
  • Yu-Hong Zhao

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2024.1306310
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11

Abstract

Read online

Background and aimsThere is an ongoing debate on whether to advocate reducing ultra-processed food (UPF) in dietary guidelines to control metabolic disease (such as obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus [T2DM]). We aimed to summarize the evidence from systematic reviews with meta-analyses between UPF consumption and metabolic diseases risk, assess the credibility, and verify the robustness of these associations.MethodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from their inception to July 15, 2023, to identify relevant systematic reviews with meta-analyses. We used the random-effects model to evaluate the summary effect size, along with 95% confidence interval and prediction interval. We also assessed heterogeneity, evidence of small-study effects and excess significance bias, and categorized the credibility of each association based on quantitative umbrella review criteria. Additionally, we conducted subgroup and sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of associations based on continents, study design, dietary assessment methods, definition methods of UPF, population, and units of UPF consumption.ResultsOverall, 6 systematic reviews with 13 meta-analyses were included. Three (23.08%) meta-analyses were classified as highly suggestive evidence for meeting the criteria that associations were significant at p < 10−6, had more than 1,000 cases, and presented the largest study with significance at p < 0.05. Among them, the highest UPF consumption quantile was associated with an increased risk of obesity (OR = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.36–1.77) when compared with the lowest UPF consumption quantile. The highest UPF consumption quantile was associated with an increased risk of T2DM (RR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.23–1.59) when compared with the lowest UPF consumption quantile, and a 10% increase in UPF consumption (% g/d) was associated with an increased risk of T2DM (RR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.10–1.13). Meanwhile, the robustness of these associations was verified by a series of subgroup and sensitivity analyses.ConclusionUPF consumption may be a risk factor for several metabolic diseases. However, well-designed studies are still needed to verify our findings in the future.

Keywords