AIDS Research and Therapy (Aug 2019)

Positioning of darunavir/cobicistat-containing antiretroviral regimens in real life: results from a large multicentre observational prospective cohort (SCOLTA)

  • Lucia Taramasso,
  • Elena Ricci,
  • Antonio Cascio,
  • Laura Valsecchi,
  • Barbara Menzaghi,
  • Nicola Squillace,
  • Paolo Maggi,
  • Giuseppe Vittorio De Socio,
  • Chiara Dentone,
  • Giordano Madeddu,
  • Giovanni F. Pellicanò,
  • Leonardo Calza,
  • Goffredo Angioni,
  • Paolo Bonfanti,
  • Antonio Di Biagio,
  • CISAI Study Group

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12981-019-0236-0
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 1
pp. 1 – 8

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Study aim was to evaluate the safety and durability of darunavir/cobicistat (DRV/c) in a real life setting. Methods Multicentre prospective cohort study performed in the context of SCOLTA (Surveillance Cohort Long-Term Toxicity Antiretrovirals). Patients were evaluated at baseline, week 24 and 48. Changes were evaluated using the paired t test or signed rank test. The multivariable analysis was performed using a general linear model, after ranking of not normally distributed variables. Results A total of 249 patients were included, 72 (29%) were in DRV/c-based dual therapies (DT). Hypercholesterolemia, HC, (total cholesterol (TC) ≥ 200 mg/dL or low density-C (LDL-C) ≥ 130 or statin use) was present in 121 (48.6%) and hypertriglyceridemia, (triglycerides (TG) ≥ 200 mg/dl or fibrate use) in 41 (16.5%) patients. Blood lipid profile did not change significantly in either the global population or patients with HC. After a median observation of 17 months (IQR 13–20), 59 (25.3%) patients discontinued DRV/c, of which 13 were in DT. The durability DT resulted higher than that of triple therapy (log-rank test p = 0.01). Main reasons for stopping DRV/c were simplification (15 patients), adverse events (13 patients), planned discontinuation for treatment initiation with DAA (4 patients), treatment failure (2 patients); death (2 patients), other causes (10 patients). Twenty-six were lost to follow-up. Conclusions DRV/c was safe and well tolerated. Dual therapies showed a better profile of tolerability and a longer durability compared to triple therapies.

Keywords