PLoS ONE (Jan 2023)

Ureteral calculi in octogenarians and nonagenarians: Contemporary in-hospital management-A joint study by the endourological section of the Austrian Association of Urology.

  • Martin Drerup,
  • Mehmet Özsoy,
  • Clemens Wehrberger,
  • Matthias Lenz,
  • Christian Ramesmayer,
  • Philipp Stolzlechner,
  • Johannes Zanier,
  • C E Falkensammer,
  • Ivan Handjev,
  • Andreas Wasserscheid,
  • Stephan Seklehner

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280140
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18, no. 1
p. e0280140

Abstract

Read online

AimTo assess contemporary in-hospital management of octogenarians and nonagenarians with ureteral calculi.Materials and methodsReview of patients aged ≥80 years hospitalized due to ureteral calculi. Data was extracted from eight Austrian centers of urology. Stone and patient related data were recorded. Treatment patterns in acute and elective settings were assessed.ResultsA total of 759 patients hospitalized with ureteral calculi were analyzed. Out of them, 643 were octogenarians (80-89years) and 116 nonagenarians (90-99 years). In an acute setting, simple de-obstruction with urinary diversions outnumbered active stone treatments like URS and SWL (62.6% vs. 26.9% vs. 10.5%). Decision making whether patients underwent active stone treatment was driven by stone location (OR = 0.28, p0.05). In elective settings, 81.5% of procedures were active stone treatments-mainly URS (76.9%), while DJ stent or nephrostomy replacements were noted in 14.2% and 4.3%. Octogenarians (OR = 14, pConclusionIn acute settings, age and extend of mobility were not found to be independent predictors for active stone treatment. In elective settings, after having received urinary diversions, reduced mobility and nonagenarians were less likely to undergo stone removal treatments. Safety and efficacy of URS seems to be similar in octogenarians and nonagenarians.