Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology (Jan 2019)

Evaluating the efficacy of the single-incision uphold system for pelvic organ prolapse repair

  • Yu-Wei Chang,
  • Fei-Chi Chuang,
  • Ling-Ying Wu,
  • Tsai-Hwa Yang,
  • Fu-Tsai Kung,
  • Kuan-Hui Huang

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 58, no. 1
pp. 94 – 98

Abstract

Read online

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and clinical outcomes of pelvic floor reconstruction with transvaginal mesh of the Uphold™ Vaginal Support System (Boston Scientific Corporation). Materials and methods: This retrospective study reviewed the medical records of patients with pelvic organ prolapse stage 3 or 4 who underwent pelvic reconstructive surgery with transvaginal mesh of the Uphold™ Vaginal Support System from January 2015 to March 2017. Patients who were treated with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, transvaginal sacrospinous ligament suspension or other mesh kits were excluded. Assessments included pre- and postoperative Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) stage, Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 (UDI-6), Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 (IIQ-7), urodynamic parameters, peri- and postoperative complications and symptoms. Results: Of the 111 enrolled women, the anatomical success rate was 97.3% after a median 18.4 months of follow-up. POP-Q parameters, UDI-6 and IIQ-7 scores, maximum urine flow rate, and post-void residual urine all significantly improved after surgery. Complications included one case (0.9%) of infected hematoma, two cases (1.8%) of mesh exposure, three cases (2.7%) of recurrent prolapse, and 12 cases (10.8%) of transient urine retention. No bladder or bowel injuries occurred during surgery. Conclusions: Pelvic reconstructive surgery with transvaginal mesh of the Uphold™ System yielded satisfactory anatomical and urinary functional outcomes in a median 18.4 months of follow-up. IRB identifier: IRB: 201700645B0 Keywords: Pelvic organ prolapse, Transvaginal mesh, Uphold system