Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics (Jan 2020)

Impact of Hormone Use Perceptions on Consumer Meat Preferences

  • Ruoye Yang,
  • Kellie Curry Raper,
  • Jayson L. Lusk

DOI
https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.298437
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 45, no. 1
pp. 107 – 123

Abstract

Read online

U.S. consumers see retail beef products with "no added hormones" (NAH) labels. However, similar labels appear on pork and chicken products, even though hormone use in their production is prohibited. This study assesses consumer perceptions of hormone use in different livestock species. Using choice experiment data, we then examine the impact of these perceptions on preferences for unlabeled meat products and willingness to pay for NAH-labeled meat products. Results suggest that consumer perceptions of hormone use in production are incorrect. Further, perceptions influence consumer preferences and willingness to pay for unlabeled products versus those with NAH labels.

Keywords