Systematic review of oral health in slums and non-slum urban settings of Low and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs): Disease prevalence, determinants, perception, and practices.

Abstract

BackgroundA comprehensive summary of evidence about oral health in slum settings that could inform policy directions is lacking.ObjectiveTo summarise the latest evidence regarding oral disease burden and their determinants, perceptions, practices, and service utilization in the slums and non-slum urban settings of LMICs.DesignSystematic review.Data sourcesEmbase and MEDLINE (Ovid); PubMed; Scopus, Web of Science, CRD DARE Database; ELDIS; Essential Health Links; HINARI; African Index Medicus (AIM); and Bioline International, all searched from January 2000 to June 2023 using slum-related terms.Eligibility criteriaEmpirical studies of all designs were eligible. Studies published in English with full-text available and reporting disease burden, perceptions, behaviours and service utilisation related to oral health of residents of slums or broader settings including slums in low and middle-income countries were included.Data extraction, quality assessment, synthesis and reportingStudies were categorised and data were extracted and charted according to a preliminary conceptual framework refined by emerging findings. The Mixed Methods Assessment Tool (MMAT) was used to appraise the quality of empirical studies. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and (where applicable) the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) guideline were adopted for guiding synthesis and reporting. Results were tabulated and narratively summarised.ResultsFull-text articles for 56 records were assessed for eligibility and 23 of the articles were included in this review. The majority (13 studies, 57%) were conducted in Asia, and nine studies (39%) in Africa. Six focused on slums (two examined slum and urban non-slum and four examined purely slum settings), two examined general urban settings, eight included both rural and urban areas in their settings, two examined disadvantaged/low socioeconomic, one assessed rural/urban/metropolis/municipal/district, three covered the national population or whole country, and one looked at high versus low socioeconomic regions. The commonest oral diseases reported were dental caries (prevalence: 13% - 76%), and periodontal diseases (prevalence: 23% - 99%). These were higher in slum settings and showed differences across age groups, gender, and socioeconomic classes. Most participants in the studies perceived their oral health status as satisfactory, a belief commoner among younger people, males, those in higher socio-economic classes, and employed. Mouth cleaning was mostly once daily, usually in the mornings. The use of toothpaste and brush was commonest. Other oral hygiene implements included toothpowder, chewing-stick, neem, charcoal, sand, snuff, salt, and the fingers. There was widespread engagement in home remedies for oral disease cure or prevention, while the use of professional dental care facilities was generally low and problem-driven.ConclusionThe systematic review identified a sparse body of literature on oral health surveys in slums and other urban settings in LMICs. Available data suggest a high oral disease burden, worse in slums, use of inappropriate mouth cleaning tools, self-care practices for pain relief, and few visits to care facilities.Systematic review registrationSystematic review registration with PROSPERO in February 2020, number CRD42020123613.