Four recent insights suggest the need for more refined methods to assess the resistogenicity of doxycycline post exposure prophylaxis

Abstract

Two recently published randomized trials of doxycycline post exposure prophylaxis (PEP) have concluded that this intervention is highly effective at reducing the incidence of bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and has little or no risk of promoting the spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). In this perspective piece, we review four types of evidence that suggest that the risk of promoting AMR has been inadequately assessed in these studies. 1) The studies have all used proportion resistant as the outcome measure. This is a less sensitive measure of resistogenicity than MIC distribution. 2) These RCTs have not considered population-level pathways of AMR selection. 3) In populations with very high antimicrobial consumption such as PrEP cohorts, the relationship between antimicrobial consumption and resistance may be saturated. 4) Genetic linkage of AMR means that increased tetracycline use may select for AMR to not only tetracyclines but also other antimicrobials in STIs and other bacterial species. We recommend novel study designs to more adequately assess the AMR-inducing risk of doxycycline PEP.

Keywords

• Doxycycline PEP
• Tetracycline
• MIC
• Proportion resistant
• AMR
• PrEP