BMC Medical Imaging (Jan 2023)

Clinical performance of digital breast tomosynthesis–guided vacuum-assisted biopsy: a single-institution experience in Japan

  • Mirai Ido,
  • Masayuki Saito,
  • Hirona Banno,
  • Yukie Ito,
  • Manami Goto,
  • Takahito Ando,
  • Junko Kousaka,
  • Yukako Mouri,
  • Kimihito Fujii,
  • Tsuneo Imai,
  • Shogo Nakano,
  • Kojiro Suzuki,
  • Kenta Murotani

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-022-00896-1
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 23, no. 1
pp. 1 – 9

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis guided vacuum-assisted biopsy (DBT-VAB) for microcalcifications in the breast. Methods Retrospective review of 131 mammography-guided VABs at our institution were performed. All of the targets were calcification lesion suspicious for cancer. 45 consecutive stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsies (ST-VABs) and 86 consecutive DBT-VABs were compared. Written informed consent was obtained. Tissue sampling methods and materials were the same with both systems. Student’s t-test was used to compare procedure time and the Fisher’s exact test was used to compare success rate, complications, and histopathologic findings for the 2 methods. Results The tissue sampling success rate was 95.6% for ST-VAB (43/45) and 97.7% (84/86) for DBT-VAB. Time for positioning (10.6 ± 6.4 vs. 6.7 ± 5.3 min), time for biopsy (33.4 ± 13.1 vs. 22.5 ± 13.1 min), and overall procedure time (66.6 ± 16.6 min vs. 54.5 ± 13.0 min) were substantially shorter with DBT-VAB (P < 0.0001). There were no differences in the distribution of pathological findings between the 2 groups. Conclusion Depth information and stable visibility of the target provided by DBT images led to quick decisions about target coordinates and improved the clinical performance of microcalcification biopsies.

Keywords