Frontiers in Oncology (Jul 2023)

Wedge resection versus segment IVb and V resection of the liver for T2 gallbladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Zhehan Chen,
  • Jiayu Yu,
  • Jiasheng Cao,
  • Jiasheng Cao,
  • Chenping Lin,
  • Jiahao Hu,
  • Jiahao Hu,
  • Bin Zhang,
  • Bin Zhang,
  • Jiliang Shen,
  • Jiliang Shen,
  • Xu Feng,
  • Xu Feng,
  • Win Topatana,
  • Win Topatana,
  • Mingyu Chen,
  • Mingyu Chen,
  • Haixing Fang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1186378
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13

Abstract

Read online

ObjectivesAlthough guidelines recommend extended cholecystectomy for T2 gallbladder cancer (GBC), the optimal hepatectomy strategy remains controversial. The study aims to compare the prognosis of T2 GBC patients who underwent wedge resection (WR) versus segment IVb and V resection (SR) of the liver.MethodsA specific search of online databases was performed from May 2001 to February 2023. The postoperative efficacy outcomes were synthesized and meta-analyses were conducted.ResultsA total of 9 studies involving 2,086 (SR = 627, WR = 1,459) patients were included in the study. The primary outcomes included disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). For DFS, the 1-year DFS was statistically higher in patients undergoing SR than WR [risk ratio (RR) = 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.02-1.13, P = 0.007]. The 3-year DFS (P = 0.95), 5-year DFS (P = 0.77), and hazard ratio (HR) of DFS (P = 0.72) were similar between the two groups. However, the 3-year OS was significantly lower in patients who underwent SR than WR [RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.82-0.99, P = 0.03]. Moreover, SR had a higher hazard HR of OS [HR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.01-1.75, P = 0.04]. No significant difference was found in 1-year (P = 0.32) and 5-year (P = 0.9) OS. For secondary outcomes, patients who received SR tended to develop postoperative complications (POC) [RR = 1.90, 95% CI = 1.00-3.60, P = 0.05]. In addition, no significant differences in intrahepatic recurrence (P = 0.12) were observed.ConclusionsIn conclusion, SR can improve the prognosis of T2 GBC patients in DFS. In contrast to WR, the high HR and complications associated with SR cannot be neglected. Therefore, surgeons should evaluate the condition of the patients and take their surgical skills into account when selecting SR.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier, CRD42022362974.

Keywords