Diagnostics (Jan 2024)

Determining <i>Pneumocystis jirovecii</i> Colonisation from Infection Using PCR-Based Diagnostics in HIV-Negative Individuals

  • Anna Louise Watson,
  • John Woodford,
  • Sumudu Britton,
  • Rita Gupta,
  • David Whiley,
  • Kate McCarthy

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14010114
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 1
p. 114

Abstract

Read online

Background: Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia is increasingly diagnosed with highly sensitive PCR diagnostics in immunocompromised, HIV-negative individuals. We assessed the performance of our in-house quantitative PCR with the aim to optimise interpretation. Methods: Retrospective audit of all positive P. jirovecii qPCRs on induced sputum or BAL fluid at a single centre from 2012 to 2023. Medical and laboratory records were analysed and people with HIV were excluded. Cases were categorised as colonisation, high-probability PCP or uncertain PCP infection against a clinical gold standard incorporating clinico-radiological data. Quantitative PCR assay targeting the 5s gene was utilised throughout the time period. Results: Of the 82 positive qPCRs, 28 were categorised as high-probability PCP infection, 30 as uncertain PCP and 24 as colonisation. There was a significant difference in qPCR values stratified by clinical category but not respiratory sample type. Current assay performance with a cutoff of 2.5 × 105 copies/mL had a sensitivity of 50% (95% CI, 30.65–69.35%) and specificity of 83.33% (95% CI, 62.62–95.26%). Youden Index calculated at 6.5 × 104 copies/mL had a sensitivity of 75% (56.64–87.32%, 95% CI) and specificity of 66.67% (46.71–82.03%, 95% CI). High and low cutoffs were explored. Significant variables associated with infection were age > 70 years old, the presence of fever, hypoxia or ground glass changes. Conclusions: A single qPCR cutoff cannot reliably determine P. jirovecii infection from colonisation. Low and high cutoffs are useful, however, a large “possible infection” cohort will remain where interpretation of clinic-radiological factors remains essential. Standardisation of assays with prospective validation in specific immunocompromised groups will allow greater generalisability and allow large-scale prospective assay validation to be performed.

Keywords