SOIL (Dec 2017)

Planning spatial sampling of the soil from an uncertain reconnaissance variogram

  • R. M. Lark,
  • E. M. Hamilton,
  • B. Kaninga,
  • B. Kaninga,
  • K. K. Maseka,
  • M. Mutondo,
  • G. M. Sakala,
  • G. M. Sakala,
  • M. J. Watts

DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-3-235-2017
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 3
pp. 235 – 244

Abstract

Read online

An estimated variogram of a soil property can be used to support a rational choice of sampling intensity for geostatistical mapping. However, it is known that estimated variograms are subject to uncertainty. In this paper we address two practical questions. First, how can we make a robust decision on sampling intensity, given the uncertainty in the variogram? Second, what are the costs incurred in terms of oversampling because of uncertainty in the variogram model used to plan sampling? To achieve this we show how samples of the posterior distribution of variogram parameters, from a computational Bayesian analysis, can be used to characterize the effects of variogram parameter uncertainty on sampling decisions. We show how one can select a sample intensity so that a target value of the kriging variance is not exceeded with some specified probability. This will lead to oversampling, relative to the sampling intensity that would be specified if there were no uncertainty in the variogram parameters. One can estimate the magnitude of this oversampling by treating the tolerable grid spacing for the final sample as a random variable, given the target kriging variance and the posterior sample values. We illustrate these concepts with some data on total uranium content in a relatively sparse sample of soil from agricultural land near mine tailings in the Copperbelt Province of Zambia.