PLoS ONE (Jan 2021)

Cost of whole genome sequencing for non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica.

  • Laura Ford,
  • Kathryn Glass,
  • Deborah A Williamson,
  • Vitali Sintchenko,
  • Jennifer M B Robson,
  • Emily Lancsar,
  • Russell Stafford,
  • Martyn D Kirk

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248561
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 3
p. e0248561

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundWhile whole genome sequencing (WGS) may be more expensive than traditional testing and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), simple cost comparisons ignore the potential for WGS to reduce the societal costs of non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica through public health action to prevent illness.MethodsWe determined how many cases the use of WGS data would need to prevent to be cost-equal to serotyping and MLVA, or culture independent testing based on PCR in Australia. We then examined the costs and cost-savings of current typing methods compared with WGS in outbreak scenarios.ResultsA median of 275 (90% CrI -55-775) or 1.9% (90% CrI -0.4%-5.4%) of notified serotyped Salmonella cases would need to be prevented for WGS to be cost-equal to current typing methods and 1,550 (90% CrI 820-2,725) or 9.6% of all notified Salmonella cases would need to be prevented to be cost-equal to PCR. WGS is likely to result in cost savings in prolonged outbreaks, where data can support earlier public health action.ConclusionsDespite currently having a higher cost per isolate, routine WGS of Salmonella was no more expensive than existing typing methods or PCR where >2% of illness was averted.