Clinical Ophthalmology (May 2024)

Viral Conjunctivitis Rates Unchanged Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in an Ophthalmology Clinic

  • Piazza AN,
  • Downie PA,
  • Lee MS,
  • Lindgren BR,
  • Olson JH

Journal volume & issue
Vol. Volume 18
pp. 1289 – 1294

Abstract

Read online

Amber N Piazza,1 Peter A Downie,1,2 Michael S Lee,3 Bruce R Lindgren,4 Joshua H Olson3 1Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA; 2Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA; 3Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Neurosciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA; 4Masonic Cancer Center Biostatistics Core, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USACorrespondence: Joshua H Olson, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Neurosciences, University of Minnesota, 516 Delaware St SE, MMC 493, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA, Tel +1-612-625-4400, Fax +1-612-626-7882, Email [email protected]: Millions of acute conjunctivitis cases occur in the United States annually. The impact of COVID-19 mitigation practices on viral conjunctivitis incidence within ophthalmology clinics has not been reported. We hypothesized that viral conjunctivitis rates would decrease with implementation of such practices.Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted at a single academic center’s ophthalmology clinics. Electronic health record data was queried using ICD-10 diagnostic codes to include 649 patients aged 2– 97 with viral, bacterial, or allergic conjunctivitis diagnosed either before (6/1/2018– 5/1/2019) or during (6/1/2020– 5/1/2021) COVID-19 precautions. Conjunctivitis rates per ophthalmology clinic visit were compared using rate-ratio analysis. Logistic regression evaluated the effects of age, sex, and race among those with conjunctivitis.Results: A total of 66,027 ophthalmology clinic visits occurred during the study period. Viral conjunctivitis rates per visit did not significantly change after enacting COVID-19 mitigation strategies, but allergic conjunctivitis rates significantly increased (viral: RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.31, p=0.408; allergic: RR 1.70, 95% CI 1.43 to 2.03, p< 0.001). When controlling for time, younger age (≤ median age 55) (p=0.005) and Caucasian race (p=0.009) were associated with higher viral conjunctivitis frequency.Conclusion: Contrary to trends reported in emergency departments, viral conjunctivitis rates within an ophthalmology clinic did not significantly change after COVID-19 mitigation strategies, though allergic conjunctivitis rates increased. Patients’ avoidance of emergency departments during the pandemic may have contributed. Further investigation is required to explore variation in ophthalmology patient populations and needs based on care setting.Plain Language Summary: A retrospective review included 649 patients with viral, bacterial, or allergic conjunctivitis diagnosed at a single center’s ophthalmology clinics before (6/1/2018– 5/1/2019) or during (6/1/2020– 5/1/2021) COVID-19 precautions. Contrary to emergency department experiences, viral conjunctivitis rates did not significantly change after COVID-19 precautions. However, allergic conjunctivitis rates significantly increased. Conjunctivitis presentation in ophthalmology clinics differed from that reported in emergency departments, warranting further evaluation of variation in patient needs by setting.Keywords: viral conjunctivitis, allergic conjunctivitis, conjunctivitis transmission, COVID-19, COVID-19 precautions

Keywords