Frontiers in Oncology (Jan 2023)

Pretreatment glasgow prognostic score predicts survival among patients administered first-line atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide for small cell lung cancer

  • Satoshi Wasamoto,
  • Hisao Imai,
  • Hisao Imai,
  • Takeshi Tsuda,
  • Yoshiaki Nagai,
  • Hiroyuki Minemura,
  • Yutaka Yamada,
  • Yukihiro Umeda,
  • Takayuki Kishikawa,
  • Ayako Shiono,
  • Yuki Kozu,
  • Jun Shiihara,
  • Ou Yamaguchi,
  • Atsuto Mouri,
  • Kyoichi Kaira,
  • Kenya Kanazawa,
  • Hirokazu Taniguchi,
  • Takayuki Kaburagi,
  • Koichi Minato,
  • Hiroshi Kagamu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1080729
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundThere are no established predictive biomarkers for the effectiveness of first-line atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide therapy in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Therefore, the current study aimed to investigate whether the Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and body mass index (BMI) can predict the effectiveness of first-line atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide therapy in patients with extensive-disease SCLC.MethodsWe reviewed data from 84 patients who received first-line atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide therapy for SCLC at nine Japanese institutions between August 2019 and May 2021. Further, we evaluated the prognostic value of the GPS, NLR, and BMI. The Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Moreover, the GPS, NLR, and BMI consisted of C-reactive protein and albumin concentrations, neutrophil and lymphocyte counts, and body weight and height, respectively.ResultsThe response rate was 72.6% (95% confidence interval: 63.0–82.1%). The median PFS and OS from the initiation of treatment were 5.4 (95% CI: 4.9–5.9) months and 15.4 (95% CI: 11.4–16.8) months, respectively. The GPS independently predicted the effectiveness of first-line atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide treatment, as a favorable GPS (GPS 0–1) was correlated with significantly better PFS and OS rates compared to a poor GPS (GPS 2) (PFS: 5.8 vs. 3.8 months, p = 0.0005; OS: 16.5 vs. 8.4 months, p<0.0001).ConclusionsThis is the first analysis to evaluate the association between the GPS, NLR, and BMI and the treatment effectiveness of survival among patients receiving first-line atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide therapy for SCLC. Among patients receiving this treatment for SCLC, GPS was significantly associated with the PFS and OS rates, suggesting that GPS might be useful for evaluating therapeutic outcomes in these patients.

Keywords