Agricultural & Environmental Letters (Nov 2017)

Ecosystem Services and Disservices Are Bundled in Simple and Diverse Cover Cropping Systems

  • Denise M. Finney,
  • Ebony G. Murrell,
  • Charles M. White,
  • Barbara Baraibar,
  • Mary E. Barbercheck,
  • Brosi A. Bradley,
  • Sarah Cornelisse,
  • Mitchell C. Hunter,
  • Jason P. Kaye,
  • David A. Mortensen,
  • Christina A. Mullen,
  • Meagan E. Schipanski

DOI
https://doi.org/10.2134/ael2017.09.0033
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2, no. 1

Abstract

Read online

Agroecosystems are increasingly expected to provide multiple ecosystem services. We tested whether and how cover crop selection (identity and number of species) affects provisioning of multiple services (multifunctionality). In a 3-yr study of 10 cover crop treatments and eight ecosystem services, certain services consistently co-occurred. One such service “bundle” included cover crop biomass production, weed suppression, and nitrogen retention. Another set of bundled services included cash crop production, nitrogen supply, and profitability. We also identified trade-offs: as some services increased, other disservices arose, limiting multifunctionality. However, functionally diverse mixtures ameliorated disservices associated with certain monocultures, thereby increasing cover crop multifunctionality.