Elucidating the nature of acinic cell carcinoma of the breast with high-grade morphology: evidence from case report

Abstract

Abstract Background Acinic cell carcinoma (AciCC) of the breast is a rare subtype of breast cancer. It was considered a low-grade triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with the potential to progress or transform into a high-grade lesion because of the molecular similarities with conventional aggressive TNBC in several genetic studies. Microscopically, the coexistence of classical low-grade and high-grade triple-negative components in breast AciCC is not uncommon. However, there is a scarcity of research on the comparative histopathological and genetic aspects of both components. Case presentation A 34-year-old woman with a nontender mass in the upper outer quadrant of the left breast was initially diagnosed with a malignant small round cell tumor (undifferentiated or poorly differentiated carcinoma) based on a preoperative biopsy, which was later identified as breast AciCC with a high-grade solid component. Left breast-conserving surgery with sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed. Microscopically, the breast AciCC consisted of a classical acinic component and a high-grade component. The latter demonstrated a solid sheet-like pattern characterized by large, round, pleomorphic or vesicular nuclei, prominent nucleoli, and frequent mitotic activities. Classical acinic architectures focally merged together to form solid nests and transited into high-grade areas. Remarkably, in the high-grade lesion, conventional immunochemical markers for breast AciCC, such as α1-antitrypsin (AAT), Lysozyme (LYS), Epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), S100 protein (S100), and cytokeratin (CK) were negative, whereas cell cycle protein D1 (cyclin D1) and vimentin showed diffuse expression. Next‑generation sequencing (NGS) revealed that 43.5% of variants were identical in both components. Furthermore, PAK5 mutation; copy number (CN) loss of CDH1, CHEK1, and MLH1; and CN gains of CDK6, HGF, and FOXP1 were identified in the high-grade lesion. The patient was treated with eight cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (epirubicin combined with cyclophosphamide) and radiotherapy after surgery, and she is currently alive for 43 months with no metastases or recurrences. Conclusions This case demonstrates a comparative analysis of the histopathological and genetic characteristics of classical low-grade and high-grade components of AciCC within the same breast. This information may serve as a morphological and molecular basis for further investigation into the molecular mechanisms underlying high-grade lesions in breast AciCC.

Keywords

• Acinic cell carcinoma
• Triple-negative breast carcinoma
• High-grade morphology
• Next‑generation sequencing
• High-grade transformation