Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology (Feb 2023)

SG-APSIC1038: Hospital-wide study to evaluate the tolerability and acceptability of alcohol-based hand rubs according to WHO protocol, and healthcare worker hand hygiene behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic

  • Yew Fong Lee,
  • Wei Hong Lai,
  • Peh Yee Lee,
  • Samual Chuo Yew Ting,
  • Irena Albert Nuja,
  • Hie Ung Ngian,
  • Jiancong Wang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.49
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 3
pp. s16 – s16

Abstract

Read online

Objectives: To evaluate the tolerability and acceptability of 3 different alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) products, and to determine factors influencing hand hygiene (HH) behavior among healthcare workers (HCWs) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Sarawak General Hospital, a 1,034-bed tertiary-care state hospital. A self-administered 7-point Likert scale questionnaire was adapted from the WHO ‘Protocol for Evaluation of Tolerability and Acceptability of ABHR.’ The study was conducted between November 12 and 26, 2021, based on 3 types of ABHR products. Participation in answering the questionnaire was voluntary, so consent was implied. The Student t test was used to determine the significant differences among the ABHR product. The χ2 distribution test was performed to evaluate the characteristics of ABHR products. Results: We received a response rate of 35% (1,598 of 4,628); 82% of respondents were female, and the overall cohort had a mean age of 35 years. Also, 972 (61%) of 1,598 respondents were nurses, and 1,490 (93%) of 1,598 respondents used ABHR at least 5 days every week. Of 1,598 respondents, 1,156 (72%) indicated that ABHR products were easily accessible at the point of patient care. Evaluation of ABHR products showed that respondents were receptive to all product colors (P .05). Comparison among ABHR products yielded no statistical difference (P > .05) for ‘smell,’ ‘stickiness,’ ‘irritation,’ or ‘drying speed.’ ‘Drying effect’ of all products was statistically significant (P < .0252). The overall satisfaction for all products was good (P < .0022). HCWs did not expect their HH compliance to improve even if they were provided with their preferred choice of ABHR. Of 1,598 respondents, 783 (49%) correctly used a palm-full of ABHR for HH, and 1, 275 (80%) indicated that hospital management should organize more HH-related awareness and continuous medical education on HH. Conclusions: A comparison among different ABHR characteristics mostly showed no statistically significant difference regarding tolerability and acceptability. These findings suggest that different ABHR products will not influence HH behavior during COVID-19 pandemic.