Conservation Letters (Sep 2024)

Genetic variation and hybridization determine the outcomes of conservation reintroductions

  • Colter A. Feuerstein,
  • Ryan P. Kovach,
  • Carter G. Kruse,
  • Matt E. Jaeger,
  • Donovan A. Bell,
  • Zachary L. Robinson,
  • Andrew R. Whiteley

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.13049
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 5
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract The preservation of genetic variation is fundamental in biodiversity conservation, yet its importance for population viability remains contentious. Mixed‐source reintroductions, where individuals are translocated into a single vacant habitat from multiple genetically divergent and often depauperate populations, provide an opportunity to evaluate how genetic variation and hybridization influence individual and relative population fitness. Population genetic theory predicts that individuals with higher genetic variation and hybrids among populations should have higher fitness. We tested these two hypotheses by analyzing individual and population‐scale data for westslope cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii lewisi) in four mixed‐source reintroductions. We observed more hybrid and fewer nonhybrid offspring than expected across four independent mixed‐source reintroductions. We also found clear evidence that heterozygosity influenced individual reproductive and relative population fitness. Overall, we found a strong, positive relationship between genetic variation, hybridization, and transplant fitness, emphasizing the importance of genetic variation and population mixing in conservation.

Keywords