The Effect of Keratinized Mucosa on Peri-Implant Health and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this systematic review was to analyze the effect of keratinized mucosa (KM) on different peri-implant health-related parameters and on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Material and methods: Randomized controlled trials, cohort, cross-sectional and case–control human studies with a follow-up period of at least 6 months comparing two groups of patients with presence or absence of KM, or with KM < 2 mm or ≥2 mm were included. Primary outcomes were implant failures, PROMs and BoP (BoP/mBI). Additional outcomes were PPD, plaque accumulation (mPI/PI), gingival inflammation (GI/mGI), marginal bone loss (MBL), soft tissue recession (REC) and biological complications. Results: Fifteen studies were included (one RCT, two cohort prospective and twelve cross-sectional). Meta-analysis was performed for cross-sectional studies. Implant failure and complications were not presented as outcome measures, and five studies analyzed PROMs. Results from the meta-analysis reported no evidence of any statistical significant difference between groups in PPD, BoP and MBL, while a statistical significant difference in GI/BI, PI and REC was present in favor of the group with KW ≥ 2 mm. More biological complications were present in the group with no KM/KM < 2 mm but few cases were present to draw any conclusions. Although a meta-analysis could not be performed, a consistent trend toward the worst pain/discomfort in KM < 2 mm was observed. Conclusions: No clear evidence was found supporting the role of KM in peri-implant health and PROMs, even if more plaque and marginal inflammation were present in the KM < 2 mm group. Clinical relevance: KM could have a role in patients with erratic maintenance and patient comfort.

Keywords

• keratinized mucosa
• PROMs
• peri-implant health
• implant failure
• systematic review
• meta-analysis