Comparison of Five Methods for the Determination of Rubella Immunity

Robert L. Sautter; Arthur E. Crist; Lynn M. Johnson; William D. LeBar

doi:10.1155/S1064744994000062

Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology (Jan 1994)

Comparison of Five Methods for the Determination of Rubella Immunity

Robert L. Sautter,
Arthur E. Crist,
Lynn M. Johnson,
William D. LeBar

Affiliations

Robert L. Sautter: Department of Pathology, Harrisburg Hospital, Polyclinic Medical Center, Harrisburg, PA, USA
Arthur E. Crist: Department of Pathology, Polyclinic Medical Center, Harrisburg, PA, USA
Lynn M. Johnson: Department of Laboratories, Polyclinic Medical Center, Harrisburg, PA, USA
William D. LeBar: Citation Clinical Laboratories, Providence Hospital, Microbiology Laboratory, Southfield, MI, USA

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/S1064744994000062
Journal volume & issue: Vol. 1, no. 4
pp. 188 – 192

Abstract

Read online

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of commonly used methods for the detection of rubella immunity, especially the fully automated IMx assay.

Published in Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology

ISSN: 1064-7449 (Print); 1098-0997 (Online)
Publisher: Wiley
Country of publisher: United Kingdom
LCC subjects: Medicine: Gynecology and obstetrics; Medicine: Internal medicine: Infectious and parasitic diseases
Website: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/idog/

About the journal