Nature Communications (Sep 2024)

Effect of single blastocyst-stage versus single cleavage-stage embryo transfer on cumulative live births in women with good prognosis undergoing in vitro fertilization: Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Xiang Ma,
  • Jing Wang,
  • Yuhua Shi,
  • Jichun Tan,
  • Yichun Guan,
  • Yun Sun,
  • Bo Zhang,
  • Junli Zhao,
  • Jianqiao Liu,
  • Yunxia Cao,
  • Hong Li,
  • Cuilian Zhang,
  • Feng Chen,
  • Honggang Yi,
  • Ze Wang,
  • Xing Xin,
  • Pingping Kong,
  • Yao Lu,
  • Ling Huang,
  • Yingying Yuan,
  • Haiying Liu,
  • Caihua Li,
  • Ben Willem J. Mol,
  • Zhibin Hu,
  • Heping Zhang,
  • Zi-Jiang Chen,
  • Jiayin Liu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-52008-y
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 1
pp. 1 – 13

Abstract

Read online

Abstract In this multicenter, non-inferiority, randomized trial, we randomly assigned 992 women undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) with a good prognosis (aged 20-40, ≥3 transferrable cleavage-stage embryos) to strategies of blastocyst-stage (n = 497) or cleavage-stage (n = 495) single embryo transfer. Primary outcome was cumulative live-birth rate after up to three transfers. Secondary outcomes were cumulative live-births after all embryo transfers within 1 year of randomization, pregnancy outcomes, obstetric-perinatal complications, and livebirths outcomes. Live-birth rates were 74.8% in blastocyst-stage group versus 66.3% in cleavage-stage group (relative risk 1.13, 95%CI:1.04-1.22; Pnon-inferiority 3 days. Among good prognosis women, a strategy of single blastocyst transfer increases cumulative live-birth rates over single cleavage-stage transfer. Blastocyst transfer resulted in higher preterm birth rates. This information should be used to counsel patients on their choice between cleavage-stage and blastocyst-stage transfer (NCT03152643, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03152643 ).