Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy (Oct 2024)

Real-World Outcomes with Lurbinectedin in Second Line and Beyond for Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer in Korea

  • Shim JS,
  • Kim Y,
  • Yuh T,
  • Lee JB,
  • Kim HR,
  • Hong MH,
  • Cho BC,
  • Lim SM

Journal volume & issue
Vol. Volume 15
pp. 149 – 159

Abstract

Read online

Joo Sung Shim,1 Youhyun Kim,1 Taeho Yuh,1 Jii Bum Lee,2 Hye Ryun Kim,2 Min Hee Hong,2 Byoung Chul Cho,2 Sun Min Lim2 1Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; 2Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of KoreaCorrespondence: Sun Min Lim, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea, Tel +82-2-2228-1946 ; +82-10-2520-3969, Email [email protected]: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 10– 15% of all lung cancers and is characterized by a high recurrence rate, early metastasis, and poor prognosis. Before the FDA approved lurbinectedin for SCLC that progressed on or after platinum-based chemotherapy in 2020, topotecan was the sole second-line option associated with hematological toxicities and modest efficacy. Lurbinectedin received conditional approval in Korea in September 2022 for metastatic SCLC progression, with the same indications. Real-world data on its efficacy remains scarce owing to its recent implementation.Patients and Methods: Patients with metastatic SCLC who progressed on or after first-line therapy (n = 51) at Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, received lurbinectedin at 3.2 mg/m². Efficacy data, including tumor response, progression, survival, and demographics, were recorded.Results: A total of fifty-one patients received lurbinectedin between April 2023 and March 2024, with thirty-four patients being eligible for the assessment. At diagnosis, approximately one-third of the patients were female, 3% had a poor performance status with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Score (ECOG PS ≥ 2), and the median age was 68. Most patients (80%) had extensive disease. Overall objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 20% and 47%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.8 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 3.3 months. Never smokers showed prolonged OS compared with current/former smokers (Smokers; 3.0 vs 7.3 months). Common adverse effects were nausea (53%), loss of appetite (24%), general weakness (18%), anemia (29%), neutropenia (12%), dizziness (6%), alopecia (6%), thrombocytopenia (3%), and pneumonia (3%). Overall, 24% of the patients experienced grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs), with the most common being anemia (9%) and neutropenia (9%).Conclusion: Real-world data suggest that lurbinectedin is a viable option for patients with SCLC who have progressed on or after platinum-based chemotherapy.Keywords: SCLC, lurbinectedin, real-world evidence, second line

Keywords