Journal of Dental Sciences (Apr 2023)

Accuracy of digital impressions for implant-supported complete-arch prosthesis when using an auxiliary geometry device

  • Hale Arikan,
  • Mehmet Muhtarogullari,
  • Sema Merve Uzel,
  • Mustafa Baris Guncu,
  • Guliz Aktas,
  • Lindsay Simone Marshall,
  • Ilser Turkyilmaz

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18, no. 2
pp. 808 – 813

Abstract

Read online

Background/purpose: Digital impressions using intraoral scanners have recently gained popularity. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the fit of full-arch screw-retained cobalt-chromium frameworks fabricated via two different digital impression methods. Materials and methods: An edentulous resin master model with four dental implants was fabricated. Forty cobalt-chromium superstructures were fabricated and evaluated according to four groups. In Group 1, the superstructures were evaluated using an intraoral scanner to generate digital impressions. Group 2 relied on the help of an auxiliary geometric appliance in generation of digital impressions via intraoral scanner. The traditional method of splinted open-tray conventional impressions was designated for Group 3. Finally, the control group (Group 4) relied on scanning of the master model directly with a laboratory scanner. Vertical marginal discrepancy was evaluated, and data obtained were statistically analyzed. Results: The highest mean vertical marginal gap value (80.86 ± 50.06 μm) was observed for Group 1 and statistically higher than Group 2, 3, and 4 (P 0.05). Conclusion: It has been suggested that the use of auxiliary geometric appliances yields increased scanning accuracy. Frameworks fabricated using the traditional splinted open-tray technique were more reliable compared to those frameworks from digital impressions.

Keywords