Cancer Medicine (Jul 2024)

Real‐world first‐line treatment with pembrolizumab for non‐small cell lung carcinoma with high PD‐L1 expression: Updated analysis

  • Yasuyuki Ikezawa,
  • Ryo Morita,
  • Hidenori Mizugaki,
  • Kazunari Tateishi,
  • Keiki Yokoo,
  • Toshiyuki Sumi,
  • Hajime Kikuchi,
  • Yasuo Kitamura,
  • Atsushi Nakamura,
  • Maki Kobayashi,
  • Mari Aso,
  • Nozomu Kimura,
  • Fumiaki Yoshiike,
  • Furuta Megumi,
  • Hisashi Tanaka,
  • Motoki Sekikawa,
  • Tsutomu Hachiya,
  • Keiichi Nakamura,
  • Fumihiro Hommura,
  • Noriaki Sukoh,
  • Kenichiro Ito,
  • Takashi Kikuchi,
  • Toshihiko Agatsuma,
  • Hiroshi Yokouchi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.70036
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 14
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Selecting pembrolizumab monotherapy (MONO) or pembrolizumab plus platinum‐based chemotherapy (COMB) for patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and high programmed death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) expression is an important issue in clinical practice. We previously conducted a retrospective multicenter observational study of patients with NSCLC and high PD‐L1 expression who received MONO or COMB as a first‐line treatment. Here, we report updated data and evaluate the long‐term outcomes. Methods We performed a retrospective multicenter study of 298 patients with NSCLC and high PD‐L1 expression who received MONO or COMB as first‐line treatment between December 2018 and January 2020. We reviewed the medical records and assessed the clinical efficacy and toxicity using a prolonged data cutoff. Results In total, 164 (median age: 74 years) and 134 (median age: 68 years) patients received MONO and COMB, respectively; patients who received COMB were younger and had better performance statuses (0–1). At the prolonged data cutoff, the median follow‐up was 20.2 (range: 0.1–41.4) months. The median progression‐free survivals were 7.5 and 13.1 months, and overall survivals (OSs) were 17.2 and 33.7 months for MONO and COMB, respectively. Treatment discontinuation rates were 21.9% and 20.1% for the MONO and COMB, respectively. With prolonged follow‐up, although COMB demonstrated an OS benefit and higher objective response rate than MONO, in the propensity score matching analysis COMB didn't demonstrate a significant benefit compared to the MONO. Conclusions COMB may be effective as a first‐line treatment for NSCLC with high PD‐L1 expression in a selected subset of patients.

Keywords