BMJ Open (May 2024)

Retrospective study investigating naloxone prescribing and cost in US Medicaid and Medicare patients

  • Kenneth L McCall,
  • Brian J Piper,
  • Christopher D Manko,
  • Mohamed S Ahmed,
  • Lavinia R Harrison,
  • Srivastava A Kodavatiganti,
  • Noelia Lugo,
  • Jason Osei Konadu,
  • Farrin Khan,
  • Carrie A Massari,
  • Tenisha K Sealey,
  • Maame Efua Addison,
  • Celine N Mbah,
  • Joseph B Fraiman

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078592
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 5

Abstract

Read online

Background Opioid overdoses in the USA have increased to unprecedented levels. Administration of the opioid antagonist naloxone can prevent overdoses.Objective This study was conducted to reveal the pharmacoepidemiologic patterns in naloxone prescribing to Medicaid patients from 2018 to 2021 as well as Medicare in 2019.Design Observational pharmacoepidemiologic studySetting US Medicare and Medicaid naloxone claimsIntervention The Medicaid State Drug Utilisation Data File was utilised to extract information on the number of prescriptions and the amount prescribed of naloxone at a national and state level. The Medicare Provider Utilisation and Payment was also utilised to analyse prescription data from 2019.Outcome measures States with naloxone prescription rates that were outliers of quartile analysis were noted.Results The number of generic naloxone prescriptions per 100 000 Medicaid enrollees decreased by 5.3%, whereas brand naloxone prescriptions increased by 245.1% from 2018 to 2021. There was a 33.1-fold difference in prescriptions between the highest (New Mexico=1809.5) and lowest (South Dakota=54.6) states in 2019. Medicare saw a 30.4-fold difference in prescriptions between the highest (New Mexico) and lowest states (also South Dakota) after correcting per 100 000 enrollees.Conclusions This pronounced increase in the number of naloxone prescriptions to Medicaid patients from 2018 to 2021 indicates a national response to this widespread public health emergency. Further research into the origins of the pronounced state-level disparities is warranted.