Cancer Control (Oct 2024)

From Unheard to Empowered: Utilizing Communication Accommodation Theory to Address Black Men’s With Prostate Cancer Healthcare Preferences

  • Dottington Fullwood EdD, CHES,
  • Elizabeth Fallon AS,
  • Opeyemi Bolajoko PhD,
  • Justine Gunderson PhD,
  • Caleb O. Ramirez-Rivera BS, BA,
  • Shannon Pressey MS, MBA,
  • Kelly Nosbush MA,
  • Mary Ellen Young PhD,
  • Janice Krieger PhD,
  • Gladys Asiedu PhD,
  • Folakemi T. Odedina PhD

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748241293987
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 31

Abstract

Read online

Objectives Communication barriers, such as channels, comfort, and location, can negatively impact Black prostate cancer survivors’ experiences and health outcomes after treatment. Addressing these barriers promotes a survivor-centric approach that views survivors as active partners in their care. This study explored the communication preferences of Black prostate cancer survivors, focusing on preferred channels, sources, and locations for enhanced quality of life. Design Using grounded theory methodology, we conducted engaged in-depth interviews with 7 Black prostate cancer survivors, centering on their post-treatment experiences. We analyzed participant transcripts to develop codes and themes. Communication accommodation theory (CAT) was applied to examine how survivors adapt their communication styles to navigate barriers and improve their quality of life. CAT helped identify key patterns of survivors’ convergence and divergence in their communication with healthcare providers, crucial for developing survivor-centric communication strategies. Results The analysis revealed the importance of acknowledging cultural and racial perspectives in post-treatment survivorship. Themes extracted from the transcripts included communication barriers, preferences for information channels, and favored locations for sharing information. Survivors expressed a preference for a balance between face-to-face interaction and telehealth, with environments that provide safety and support playing a key role in encouraging vulnerability and open dialogue. Inclusive healthcare practices were seen as essential in empowering Black survivors to engage in meaningful communication without feeling silenced or undervalued, thus fostering a dignified quality of life. Conclusion Tailoring post-treatment communication practices to incorporate cultural sensitivity, inclusive healthcare, and safe spaces is pivotal to supporting Black survivors. These findings provide a pathway to improving survivors’ experiences and empower them to actively shape their survivorship journey. Moreover, they highlight Black men’s need for trustworthy communication with healthcare providers and peers during the post-treatment period, emphasizing the importance of direct, personalized interactions.