Vascular Health and Risk Management (Jul 2024)

The Role of Electrocardiographic Exercise Testing for the Possibility of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Patients with Sinus Bradycardia

  • Pham LT,
  • Chu SD,
  • Nguyen DX

Journal volume & issue
Vol. Volume 20
pp. 341 – 350

Abstract

Read online

Linh Tran Pham,1 Si Dung Chu,1– 3 Duy Xuan Nguyen4 1Vietnam National Heart Institute, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam; 2Training and Director of Healthcare Activities Center, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam; 3Hospital of Vietnam National University, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Vietnam; 4Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Military Hospital 105, Hanoi, VietnamCorrespondence: Si Dung Chu, Hospital of Vietnam National University, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Vietnam, Tel +84 906086168, Email [email protected]: Study on the role of electrocardiographic (ECG) exercise testing for the possibility of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) in patients with sinus bradycardia (SB).Methods: Cross-sectional descriptive, prospective study. The study on 60 patients with SB below 50 beats/minute on 12-lead electrocardiogram at rest, with or without symptoms of SB, conducted at the Vietnam National Heart Institute and Hanoi Heart Hospital from January 2020 to September 2021.Results: Sixty patients with SB were studied, 36 male (60%) and 24 female patients (40%), p > 0.05. The average age was 55.12 ± 13.89 years old. Maximum exercise capacity (MEC) is low and only reaches 7.78 ± 3.59 metabolic equivalents (METs); Not reaching 85% of predicted MEC accounts for 53.5%; Maximum exercise time is 10.53 ± 0.46 minutes; Impaired heart rate (HR) variability in patients with SB is high: Chronotropic Index < 0.8 accounts for 53.5%, not reaching 85% of predicted HR max accounts for 45%. The average HR max was 129.90 ± 29.22 beats per minute (BPM). The average maximum workload systolic blood pressure was 155.23 ± 20.59 mmHg. The average value of maximum exercise diastolic blood pressure was 88.10 ± 9.11 mmHg. The HR decreased by 27.87 ± 16.82 BPM in the first minute. Not achieving 85% of predicted MEC (p = 0.062), so it is not an independent factor predicting the ability for PPI. Only the HR variability index < 0.8 is an independent predictor for PPI in bradycardic patients, which has OR = 21.521 (95% CI: 2.27– 04.34, p < 0.05).Conclusion: Results can be seen that Chronotropic Index < 0.8 is an important marker for physicians to decide on PPI in ECG during exercise testing in SB patients and is a potential prognostic factor for the need for PPI.Keywords: role, exercise ECG testing, PPI, possibility of PPI

Keywords