Phase-insensitive versus phase-sensitive ultrasound absorption tomography in the frequency domain

Abstract

The sensitivity of phase-sensitive detectors, such as piezoelectric detectors, becomes increasingly directional as the detector element size increases. In contrast, pyroelectric sensors, which are phase-insensitive, retain their omni-directionality even for large element sizes, although they have significantly poorer temporal resolution. This study uses numerical models to examine whether phase-insensitive detectors can be used advantageously in ultrasound tomography, specifically absorption tomography, when the number of detectors is sparse. We present measurement models for phase-sensitive and phase-insensitive sensors and compare the quality of the absorption reconstructions between these sensor types based on relative error and image contrast metrics. We perform the inversion using synthetic data with a Jacobian-based linearized matrix inversion approach.

Keywords

• inverse problems
• linear inversion
• ultrasound tomography
• frequency domain ultrasound tomography
• acoustic absorption
• helmholtz equation