Microbiology Spectrum (Feb 2022)

Convalescent Plasma for Preventing Critical Illness in COVID-19: a Phase 2 Trial and Immune Profile

  • Jeffrey M. Sturek,
  • Tania A. Thomas,
  • James D. Gorham,
  • Chelsea A. Sheppard,
  • Allison H. Raymond,
  • Kristen Petros De Guex,
  • William B. Harrington,
  • Andrew J. Barros,
  • Gregory R. Madden,
  • Yosra M. Alkabab,
  • David Y. Lu,
  • Qin Liu,
  • Melinda D. Poulter,
  • Amy J. Mathers,
  • Archana Thakur,
  • Dana L. Schalk,
  • Ewa M. Kubicka,
  • Lawrence G. Lum,
  • Scott K. Heysell

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02560-21
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 1

Abstract

Read online

ABSTRACT The COVID-19 pandemic caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is an unprecedented event requiring frequent adaptation to changing clinical circumstances. Convalescent immune plasma (CIP) is a promising treatment that can be mobilized rapidly in a pandemic setting. We tested whether administration of SARS-CoV-2 CIP at hospital admission could reduce the rate of ICU transfer or 28-day mortality or alter levels of specific antibody responses before and after CIP infusion. In a single-arm phase II study, patients >18 years-old with respiratory symptoms with confirmed COVID-19 infection who were admitted to a non-ICU bed were administered two units of CIP within 72 h of admission. Levels of SARS-CoV-2 detected by PCR in the respiratory tract and circulating anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers were sequentially measured before and after CIP transfusion. Twenty-nine patients were transfused high titer CIP and 48 contemporaneous comparable controls were identified. All classes of antibodies to the three SARS-CoV-2 target proteins were significantly increased at days 7 and 14 post-transfusion compared with baseline (P < 0.01). Anti-nucleocapsid IgA levels were reduced at day 28, suggesting that the initial rise may have been due to the contribution of CIP. The groups were well-balanced, without statistically significant differences in demographics or co-morbidities or use of remdesivir or dexamethasone. In participants transfused with CIP, the rate of ICU transfer was 13.8% compared to 27.1% for controls with a hazard ratio 0.506 (95% CI 0.165–1.554), and 28-day mortality was 6.9% compared to 10.4% for controls, hazard ratio 0.640 (95% CI 0.124–3.298). IMPORTANCE Transfusion of high-titer CIP to non-critically ill patients early after admission with COVID-19 respiratory disease was associated with significantly increased anti-SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies (compared to baseline) and a non-significant reduction in ICU transfer and death (compared to controls). This prospective phase II trial provides a suggestion that the antiviral effects of CIP from early in the COVID-19 pandemic may delay progression to critical illness and death in specific patient populations. This study informs the optimal timing and potential population of use for CIP in COVID-19, particularly in settings without access to other interventions, or in planning for future coronavirus pandemics.

Keywords