Cancer Cell International (Aug 2024)
Enhanced anti-tumor effects by combination of tucatinib and radiation in HER2-overexpressing human cancer cell lines
Abstract
Abstract Background Tucatinib (TUC), a HER2-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is the first targeted drug demonstrating intracranial efficacy and significantly prolonged survival in metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) patients with brain metastases. Current treatments for brain metastases often include radiotherapy, but little is known about the effects of combination treatment with TUC. Therefore, we examined the combined effects of irradiation and TUC in human HER2-overexpressing BC, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and colorectal cancer (CRC) cell lines. For the latter two, a standard therapy successfully targeting HER2 is yet to be established. Methods Nine HER2-overexpressing (BC: BT474, ZR7530, HCC1954; CRC: LS411N, DLD1, COLO201; NSCLC: DV90, NCI-H1781) and three control cell lines (BC: MCF7, HCC38; NSCLC: NCI-H2030) were examined. WST-1 assay (metabolic activity), BrdU ELISA (proliferation), γH2AX assay (DNA double-strand breaks (DSB), Annexin V assay (apoptosis), and clonogenic assay (clonogenicity) were performed after treatment with TUC and/or irradiation (IR). The relevance of the treatment sequence was analyzed exemplarily. Results In BC, combinatorial treatment with TUC and IR significantly decreased metabolic activity, cell proliferation, clonogenicity and enhanced apoptotis compared to IR alone, whereby cell line-specific differences occurred. In the PI3KCA-mutated HCC1954 cell line, addition of alpelisib (ALP) further decreased clonogenicity. TUC delayed the repair of IR-induced DNA damage but did not induce DSB itself. Investigation of treatment sequence indicated a benefit of IR before TUC versus IR after TUC. Also in CRC and NSCLC, the combination led to a stronger inhibition of metabolic activity, proliferation, and clonogenic survival (only in NSCLC) than IR alone, whereby about 10-fold higher concentrations of TUC had to be applied than in BC to induce significant changes. Conclusion Our data indicate that combination of TUC and IR could be more effective than single treatment strategies for BC. Thereby, treatment sequence seems to be an important factor. The lower sensitivity to TUC in NSCLC and particularly in CRC (compared to BC) implicates, that tumor promotion there might be less HER2-related. Combination with inhibitors of other driver mutations may aid in overcoming partial TUC resistance. These findings are of high relevance to improve long-time prognosis especially in brain-metastasized situations given the intracranial activity of TUC.
Keywords
