Selection of 110 kV Prefabricated Steel Substations Considering Seismic Vulnerability in China

Abstract

Prefabricated modular substations are expected to become the mainstream construction type for substations in China. However, there is a lack of scientific basis for structural selection and seismic performance evaluation. Taking a 110 kV substation as an example, this study compares the construction cost of cast-in situ reinforced concrete (RC) substations and prefabricated steel (PS) ones. Two types of PS structures are considered: one with H-section steel columns and the other with box-section steel columns. A seismic vulnerability analysis is performed to compare the probability distribution of various damage states of substation building structures under different seismic damage levels. Results indicate that the construction cost of PS structures is approximately 27.9% higher than that of cast-in situ concrete. When using H-section steel columns, there is a significant difference in the flexural stiffness in two horizontal directions, resulting in reduced seismic performance in the weak-axis direction. The construction cost of using box-section steel columns is slightly higher than that of the H-section steel case, but its seismic performance is significantly improved. Although the probability of slight and moderate damage states for the box-section steel column scheme is generally higher than that of the cast-in situ RC scheme, the probability of collapse is reduced. Thus, box-section steel columns are recommended for prefabricated modular substation building structures.

Keywords

• assembled steel structure
• vulnerability
• damage probability
• cost
• structural selection