PLoS ONE (Sep 2010)

Is IP-10 an accurate marker for detecting M. tuberculosis-specific response in HIV-infected persons?

  • Delia Goletti,
  • Alamelu Raja,
  • Basirudeen Syed Ahamed Kabeer,
  • Camilla Rodrigues,
  • Archana Sodha,
  • Stefania Carrara,
  • Guy Vernet,
  • Christophe Longuet,
  • Giuseppe Ippolito,
  • Satheesh Thangaraj,
  • Marc Leportier,
  • Enrico Girardi,
  • Philippe Henri Lagrange

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012577
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 5, no. 9
p. e12577

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundThe suboptimal sensitivity of Interferon (IFN)-γ-based in-vitro assays, especially in immunocompromised individuals, emphasizes the need for alternative markers for diagnosing tuberculosis (TB). The objective of this study was to evaluate whether interferon-inducible protein (IP)-10, monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP)-2 and interleukin (IL)-2 can be useful biomarkers for evaluating a specific response to RD1 antigens associated to active TB disease in HIV-infected individuals.Methodology/principal findingsThe study was carried out in India, the country with the highest TB burden in the world. Sixty-six HIV-infected individuals were prospectively enrolled, 28 with active-pulmonary-TB and 38 without. The whole blood assay based on RD1-selected peptides (experimental test) and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In tube (QFT-IT) was performed. Plasma was harvested at day-1-post-culture and soluble factors were evaluated by ELISA. The results indicate that by detecting IP-10, the sensitivity of the experimental test and QFT-antigen (75% and 85.7% respectively) for active TB was higher compared to the same assays based on IFN-γ (42.9% and 60.7% respectively) and was not influenced by the ability to respond to the mitogen. By detecting IP-10, the specificity of the experimental test and QFT-antigen (57.9% and 13.2% respectively) for active TB was lower than what was reported for the same assays using IFN-γ-detection (78.9% and 68.4% respectively). On the other side, in vitro IL-2 and MCP-2 responses were not significantly associated with active TB.ConclusionsHIV infection does not impair RD1-specific response detected by IP-10, while it significantly decreases IFN-γ-mediated responses. At the moment it is unclear whether higher detection is related to higher sensitivity or lower specificity of the assay. Further studies in high and low TB endemic countries are needed to elucidate this.