Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (Jun 2021)

The Automatic but Flexible and Content-Dependent Nature of Syntax

  • Laura Jiménez-Ortega,
  • Laura Jiménez-Ortega,
  • Esperanza Badaya,
  • Pilar Casado,
  • Pilar Casado,
  • Sabela Fondevila,
  • Sabela Fondevila,
  • David Hernández-Gutiérrez,
  • Francisco Muñoz,
  • Francisco Muñoz,
  • José Sánchez-García,
  • Manuel Martín-Loeches,
  • Manuel Martín-Loeches

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.651158
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15

Abstract

Read online

Syntactic processing has often been considered an utmost example of unconscious automatic processing. In this line, it has been demonstrated that masked words containing syntactic anomalies are processed by our brain triggering event related potential (ERP) components similar to the ones triggered by conscious syntactic anomalies, thus supporting the automatic nature of the syntactic processing. Conversely, recent evidence also points out that regardless of the level of awareness, emotional information and other relevant extralinguistic information modulate conscious syntactic processing too. These results are also in line with suggestions that, under certain circumstances, syntactic processing could also be flexible and context-dependent. However, the study of the concomitant automatic but flexible conception of syntactic parsing is very scarce. Hence, to this aim, we examined whether and how masked emotional words (positive, negative, and neutral masked adjectives) containing morphosyntactic anomalies (half of the cases) affect linguistic comprehension of an ongoing unmasked sentence that also can contain a number agreement anomaly between the noun and the verb. ERP components were observed to emotional information (EPN), masked anomalies (LAN and a weak P600), and unmasked ones (LAN/N400 and P600). Furthermore, interactions in the processing of conscious and unconscious morphosyntactic anomalies and between unconscious emotional information and conscious anomalies were detected. The findings support, on the one hand, the automatic nature of syntax, given that syntactic components LAN and P600 were observed to unconscious anomalies. On the other hand, the flexible, permeable, and context-dependent nature of the syntactic processing is also supported, since unconscious information modulated conscious syntactic components. This double nature of syntactic processing is in line with theories of automaticity, suggesting that even unconscious/automatic, syntactic processing is flexible, adaptable, and context-dependent.

Keywords