Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems (Dec 2022)

Multiphysics Modeling of Volcanic Unrest at Mt. Ruapehu (New Zealand)

  • Fee Arens,
  • Armando Coco,
  • Joachim Gottsmann,
  • James Hickey,
  • Geoff Kilgour

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GC010572
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 23, no. 12
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Pre‐eruptive signals at the crater lake‐bearing Mt. Ruapehu (New Zealand) are either absent or hard to identify. Here, we report on geophysical anomalies arising from hydrothermal unrest (HTU) and magmatic unrest (MU) using multiphysics numerical modeling. Distinct spatio‐temporal anomalies are revealed when jointly solving for ground displacements and changes in gravitational and electrical potential fields for a set of subsurface disturbances including magma recharge and anomalous hydrothermal flow. Protracted hydrothermal injections induce measurable surface displacements (>0.5 cm) at Ruapehu's summit plateau, while magmatic pressurization (5–20 MPa) results in ground displacements below detection limits. Source density changes of 10 kg/m3 (MU simulations) and CO2 fluxes between 2,150 and 3,600 t/d (HTU simulations) induce resolvable residual gravity changes between +8 and −8 μGal at the plateau. Absolute self‐potential (SP) anomalies are predicted to vary between 0.3 and 2.5 mV for all unrest simulations and exceed the detection limit of conventional electric surveying. Parameter space exploration indicates that variations of up to 400% in the Biot‐Willis coefficient produce negligible differences in surface displacement in MU simulations, but strongly impact surface displacement in HTU simulations. Our interpretation of the findings is that monitoring of changes in SP and gravity should permit insights into MU at Ruapehu, while HTU is best characterized using ground displacements, residual gravity changes and SP anomalies. Our findings are useful to inform multiparameter monitoring strategies at Ruapehu and other volcanoes hosting crater lakes.

Keywords