PLoS ONE (Jan 2022)

Exploring the impact of trait number and type on functional diversity metrics in real-world ecosystems.

  • Timothy Ohlert,
  • Kaitlin Kimmel,
  • Meghan Avolio,
  • Cynthia Chang,
  • Elisabeth Forrestel,
  • Benjamin Gerstner,
  • Sarah E Hobbie,
  • Kimberly Komastu,
  • Peter Reich,
  • Kenneth Whitney

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272791
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 8
p. e0272791

Abstract

Read online

The use of trait-based approaches to understand ecological communities has increased in the past two decades because of their promise to preserve more information about community structure than taxonomic methods and their potential to connect community responses to subsequent effects of ecosystem functioning. Though trait-based approaches are a powerful tool for describing ecological communities, many important properties of commonly-used trait metrics remain unexamined. Previous work in studies that simulate communities and trait distributions show consistent sensitivity of functional richness and evenness measures to the number of traits used to calculate them, but these relationships have yet to be studied in actual plant communities with a realistic distribution of trait values, ecologically meaningful covariation of traits, and a realistic number of traits available for analysis. Therefore, we propose to test how the number of traits used and the correlation between traits used in the calculation of functional diversity indices impacts the magnitude of eight functional diversity metrics in real plant communities. We will use trait data from three grassland plant communities in the US to assess the generality of our findings across ecosystems and experiments. We will determine how eight functional diversity metrics (functional richness, functional evenness, functional divergence, functional dispersion, kernel density estimation (KDE) richness, KDE evenness, KDE dispersion, Rao's Q) differ based on the number of traits used in the metric calculation and on the correlation of traits when holding the number of traits constant. Without a firm understanding of how a scientist's choices impact these metric, it will be difficult to compare results among studies with different metric parametrization and thus, limit robust conclusions about functional composition of communities across systems.