Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: is it safe and reliable? A synopsis of the past, the present, and the future of HRA

Abstract

This paper discusses the existing literature in the field of metal-on-metal (MoM) hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA), the background (why was it developed), the past (what was the evidence leading to its rise and fall in clinical use), the present situation (why a potential resurgence), and the future directions for potential improvements. All literature relevant to MoM HRA was reviewed and summarized to provide a comprehensive summary. Furthermore, a detailed literature search was performed on PubMeD, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar to identify all clinical studies reporting a minimum 10 years of outcomes for modern MoM HRA devices from February 2018 to February 2023. In addition, joint registry data over the same time period, available in the public domain, was examined to extract related information on MoM HRA. Metal ions are present in almost all types of hip replacement; on the whole, however, the risk of revision for resurfacing due to metal-related pathologies is very low, but higher than in other types of bearings. There are studies that show that some brands of MoM resurfacing prostheses have achieved excellent clinical outcomes in long-term follow-up studies and are still in use although less commonly than in early 2000s. Use of alternative bearing surfaces has demonstrated excellent results in the short-term and a very critical long-term follow-up of these cases still will help establish their place in the hip arthroplasty world. HRA deserves a permanent place in the armamentarium of orthopedic surgeons and in the hand of experienced surgeons.

Keywords

• hip resurfacing arthroplasty
• total hip arthroplasty
• total hip replacement
• metal-on-metal
• follow-up
• outcomes