BMC Nephrology (Oct 2024)

Associations between leisure time, non-leisure time physical activity, and kidney function in Japanese adults: a cross-sectional study

  • Ippei Chiba,
  • Naoki Nakaya,
  • Mana Kogure,
  • Rieko Hatanaka,
  • Kumi Nakaya,
  • Sayuri Tokioka,
  • Tomohiro Nakamura,
  • Satoshi Nagaie,
  • Soichi Ogishima,
  • Taku Obara,
  • Toshimi Sato,
  • Nobuo Fuse,
  • Yoko Izumi,
  • Shinichi Kuriyama,
  • Atsushi Hozawa

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-024-03813-6
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 25, no. 1
pp. 1 – 13

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Chronic kidney disease (CKD) contributes to decreased life expectancy. We examined the association between leisure-time physical activity (LTPA), non-leisure-time physical activity (non-LTPA) and kidney function. Methods This was a cross-sectional study including 32 162 community-dwelling adults aged ≥ 20 years from the Tohoku Medical MegaBank community-based cohort study. Kidney function was evaluated using cystatin C-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) as well as self-reported LTPA and non-LTPA. CKD was defined as either eGFR decline (≤ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) or presence of albuminuria (albumin-creatinine ≥ 30 mg/g). The association between domain-specific physical activity and kidney function, and CKD prevalence was examined using multivariable-adjusted ordinary least squares and modified Poisson models. Results The mean eGFR was 98.1 (± 13.2) mL/min/1.73 m2. 3 185 (9.9%) participants were classified as having CKD. The mean LTPA and non-LTPA levels were 2.9 (± 4.2) and 16.6 (± 14.2) METs-hour/day, respectively. For LTPA, in the adjusted model, the quartile groups with higher levels had a higher kidney function (β, 0.36; 95% confidence intervals [CI], [0.06, 0.66]; p = 0.019 for the 2nd quartile, β, 0.82; 95% CI, [0.51, 1.14]; p < 0.001 for the 3rd quartile, and β, 1.16; 95% CI, [0.83, 1.49]; p < 0.001 for the 4th quartile), whereas there were no apparent associations for prevalence of CKD. For non-LTPA, 4th quartile was associated with decreased eGFR (β, -0.42; 95% CI, [-0.72, -0.11]; p = 0.007) and higher prevalence of CKD prevalence (Prevalence ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, [1.02, 1.24]; p = 0.022). These associations with kidney function remained consistent in the subgroup analyses divided by demographic and biological variables. Conclusions We observed a positive association between higher LTPA levels and better kidney function, but not association with CKD prevalence. In contrast, higher non-LTPA was negatively associated with both kidney function and CKD prevalence. These findings suggest that promoting LTPA is beneficial for kidney function.

Keywords