npj Breast Cancer (Jul 2024)

Clinical impact of drug-drug interactions on abemaciclib in the real-world experience of AB-ITALY study

  • Simone Scagnoli,
  • Simona Pisegna,
  • Angela Toss,
  • Roberta Caputo,
  • Michelino De Laurentiis,
  • Michela Palleschi,
  • Ugo de Giorgi,
  • Enrico Cortesi,
  • Agnese Fabbri,
  • Alessandra Fabi,
  • Ida Paris,
  • Armando Orlandi,
  • Giuseppe Curigliano,
  • Carmen Criscitiello,
  • Ornella Garrone,
  • Gianluca Tomasello,
  • Giuliana D’Auria,
  • Patrizia Vici,
  • Enrico Ricevuto,
  • Federica Domati,
  • Claudia Piombino,
  • Sara Parola,
  • Roberta Scafetta,
  • Alessio Cirillo,
  • Beatrice Taurelli Salimbeni,
  • Francesca Sofia Di Lisa,
  • Lidia Strigari,
  • Robert Preissner,
  • Maurizio Simmaco,
  • Daniele Santini,
  • Paolo Marchetti,
  • Andrea Botticelli

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-024-00657-z
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Abemaciclib demonstrated clinical benefit in women affected by HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer (aBC). Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) can lead to reduced treatment efficacy or increased toxicity. This retro-prospective study aimed to evaluate outcomes, DDIs’ impact, and toxicities of abemaciclib combined with endocrine therapy in a real-world setting. Patients from 12 referral Italian hospitals with HR+/HER2− aBC who received abemaciclib were included. Clinical data about comorbidities, concurrent medications, outcomes, and adverse events (AE) were collected. Drug-PIN® (Personalized Interactions Network) is a tool recognizing the role of multiple interactions between active and/or pro-drug forms combined with biochemical and demographic patient data. The software was used to define the Drug-PIN score and Drug-PIN tier (green, yellow, dark yellow, and red) for each patient. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of patients’ PFS or toxicity. One hundred seventy-three patients were included. 13% of patients had >75years. The overall response rate (ORR) was 63%. The general population’s median PFS (mPFS) was 22 months (mo), while mOS were not reached. Patients treated with abemaciclib in combination with AI and fulvestrant had a mPFS of 36 and 19 mo, respectively. The most common toxicities were diarrhea, asthenia, and neutropenia detected in 63%,49%, and 49% of patients. The number of concomitant medications and comorbidities were not associated with survival outcomes (22 vs 17 mo, p = 0.068, p = 0.99). Drug-PIN tier from dark yellow to red and Drug-PIN score >12 were associated with shorter PFS compared to no/low-risk DDIs and score <12 (15 vs 23, p = 0.005, p = 0.0017). Drug interaction was confirmed as an independent biomarker in a multivariate model (p = 0.02). No difference in any grade AE, severe toxicities, and diarrhea were detected among different age subgroups. No association was found between Drug-PIN score or Drug-PIN tier and overall toxicity (p = 0.44), severe AEs (p = 0.11), or drug reduction (p = 0.27). The efficacy and safety of abemaciclib plus ET were confirmed in a real-world setting, even in the elderly population and patients with comorbidities. Evaluation of DDIs with Drug-PIN appears to be an independent predictor of PFS.