Frontiers in Oncology (Mar 2023)

Effectiveness of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in preventing febrile neutropenia during R-FC chemoimmunotherapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: A multicenter prospective phase II study

  • Youngwoo Jeon,
  • Youngwoo Jeon,
  • Duk-Hwan Yang,
  • Suk-Joong Oh,
  • Jin-Hee Park,
  • Jung-Ah Kim,
  • Sung-Young Kim,
  • Chul-Won Choi,
  • Won-Sik Lee,
  • In-Ho Kim,
  • Yeung-Chul Mun,
  • Gi June Min,
  • Ki-Seong Eom,
  • Seok-Goo Cho,
  • Seok-Goo Cho,
  • Seok-Goo Cho

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.998014
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundA chemotherapy of rituximab, fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (R-FC) has been accepted as a promising frontline chemotherapy in selected patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Although R-FC regimen is a relatively dose-dense regimen and neutropenia incidence is more than 50%, primary prophylactic pegfilgrastim was not fully recommended in the clinical field. Therefore, the study evaluated the prophylactic effectiveness of pegfilgrastim to reduce the incidence of febrile neutropenia associated with R-FC of patients with CLL.Patients and methodsA single-arm, multicenter, prospective phase II study was designed to assess the efficacy of prophylactic pegfilgrastim. Thirty-four CLL patients were enrolled and analyzed for neutropenia and other related factors, and comparative analysis was performed with historical cohort.ResultsCompared with our historical cohort, incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia was remarkably reduced during any cycle of chemotherapy (14.7% vs. 48.2% of study cohort vs. historical cohort during C1, 5.9% vs. 65.8% during C2, 12.9% vs. 80.6% during C3, 10% vs. 84.6% during C4, 3.4% vs. 83.6% during C5, and 10.7% vs. 85.7% during C6, p <0.001). Also, cumulative incidence of disrupted chemotherapy was noticeably reduced in study cohort on any cycles of R-FC regimen (8.8% vs. 22.2% of study cohort vs. historical cohort on C2, 9.7% vs. 25.2% on C3, 13.4% vs. 26.9% on C4, 13.8% vs. 45.2% on C5, 17.9% vs. 47.3% on C6, p=0.007). In addition, treatment-related mortality was 5.9%, which significantly reduced compared to 9.6% of our historical cohort (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.42–0.79, P = 0.032).ConclusionPrimary prophylactic pegfilgrastim is effective in the prevention of neutropenia/febrile neutropenia, and infection-related mortality during R-FC regimen in patients with CLL.

Keywords