JCI Insight (Feb 2022)

RB expression confers sensitivity to CDK4/6 inhibitor–mediated radiosensitization across breast cancer subtypes

  • Andrea M. Pesch,
  • Nicole H. Hirsh,
  • Anna R. Michmerhuizen,
  • Kassidy M. Jungles,
  • Kari Wilder-Romans,
  • Benjamin C. Chandler,
  • Meilan Liu,
  • Lynn M. Lerner,
  • Charles A. Nino,
  • Connor Ward,
  • Erin F. Cobain,
  • Theodore S. Lawrence,
  • Lori J. Pierce,
  • James M. Rae,
  • Corey W. Speers

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 3

Abstract

Read online

Standard radiation therapy (RT) does not reliably provide locoregional control for women with multinode-positive breast cancer and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We hypothesized that CDK4/6 inhibition (CDK4/6i) would increase the radiosensitivity not only of estrogen receptor–positive (ER+) cells, but also of TNBC that expresses retinoblastoma (RB) protein. We found that CDK4/6i radiosensitized RB WT TNBC (n = 4, radiation enhancement ratio [rER]: 1.49–2.22) but failed to radiosensitize RB-null TNBC (n = 3, rER: 0.84–1.00). RB expression predicted response to CDK4/6i + RT (R2 = 0.84), and radiosensitization was lost in ER+/TNBC cells (rER: 0.88–1.13) after RB1 knockdown in isogenic and nonisogenic models. CDK4/6i suppressed homologous recombination (HR) in RB WT cells but not in RB-null cells or isogenic models of RB1 loss; HR competency was rescued with RB reexpression. Radiosensitization was independent of nonhomologous end joining and the known effects of CDK4/6i on cell cycle arrest. Mechanistically, RB and RAD51 interact in vitro to promote HR repair. CDK4/6i produced RB-dependent radiosensitization in TNBC xenografts but not in isogenic RB1-null xenografts. Our data provide the preclinical rationale for a clinical trial expanding the use of CDK4/6i + RT to difficult-to-control RB-intact breast cancers (including TNBC) and nominate RB status as a predictive biomarker of therapeutic efficacy.

Keywords