Frontiers in Neurology (Jul 2023)

Association between superior longitudinal fasciculus, motor recovery, and motor outcome after stroke: a cohort study

  • Thomas Jacquemont,
  • Thomas Jacquemont,
  • Romain Valabregue,
  • Lina Daghsen,
  • Lina Daghsen,
  • Eric Moulton,
  • Chiara Zavanone,
  • Chiara Zavanone,
  • Jean Charles Lamy,
  • Jean Charles Lamy,
  • Charlotte Rosso,
  • Charlotte Rosso,
  • Charlotte Rosso

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1157625
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionParieto-frontal interactions are mediated by the superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF) and are crucial to integrate visuomotor information and mediate fine motor control. In this study, we aimed to characterize the relation of white matter integrity of both parts of the SLF (SLF I and SLF II) to both motor outcome and recovery and its evolution over time in stroke patients with upper limb motor deficits.Materials and methodsFractional anisotropy (FA) values over the SLF I, SLF II, and corticospinal tract (CST) and upper limb motor performance evaluated by both the upper limb Fugl-Meyer Assessment score and maximum grip strength were measured for 16 patients at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks poststroke. FA changes were assessed over time using repeated-measures Friedman ANOVA, and correlations between motor recovery, motor outcome at 12 weeks, and FA values in the CST, SLF I, and SLF II at 3 weeks were performed using Spearman's rank-order correlation.ResultsFA values in the affected hemisphere's SLF I and SLF II at 3 weeks correlated with motor recovery at 12 weeks when assessed by the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for upper limb extremity (rho: 0.502, p: 0.04 and rho: 0.510, p: 0.04, respectively) but not when assessed by grip strength. FA values in the SLF I and SLF II were not correlated with motor outcomes. FA values in the SLF II in the affected hemisphere changed significantly over time (p: 0.016).ConclusionBoth SLF I and SLF II appeared to participate in poststroke motor recovery of complex movements but not in the motor outcome. These results argue that visually/spatially oriented motor tasks as well as more complex motor tasks using parietal associative areas should be used for poststroke rehabilitation strategies.

Keywords