Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open (Apr 2023)

Chest Wall Contouring in Transgender Men: A 20-Year Experience from a National Center

  • Henriette Pisani Sundhagen, MD,
  • Ane Bøyum Opheim, MD,
  • Anne Wæhre, MD, PhD,
  • Nina Kristine Oliver, MD, MSc,
  • Kim Alexander Tønseth, MD, PhD

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004952
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 4
p. e4952

Abstract

Read online

Background:. Several western countries have experienced a drastic increase of referrals to specialist gender services of transgender and gender-diverse people. Chest wall contouring is an important element in treatment of gender dysphoria. National data concerning this group have yet to be investigated. The aim of this study was to examine and evaluate the techniques and surgical outcome of chest wall contouring from the last 20 years from a single center in Norway. Methods:. This study is a retrospective review of all female-to-male patients who underwent chest wall contouring surgery at Oslo University Hospital between 2000 and 2020. Statistical analysis with comparison of techniques and evaluation of development over time was examined. Results:. In total, 333 patients underwent bilateral chest wall contouring, 209 (62.8%) with inframammary incision with free nipple graft (IM), and 124 (37.2%) with periareolar technique (PA). In 20 years, the average age decreased from 31 (19–68) to 24.9 years (17–61). Average body mass index was significantly lower in the PA-group than in the IM-group. Complication rate was 20.7%, with postoperative bleeding being the most frequent (9.6%). Revision surgery was required in 24.9% of the cases; periareolar technique required significantly more procedures. Conclusions:. The number of patients referred and operated on has increased drastically over a 20-year period. When comparing the techniques, the outcome concerning complications and revisions is at an acceptable level. Postoperative bleeding and revision surgery occur more often with the periareolar technique. There remains a knowledge gap concerning quality of life and satisfaction after surgery within this patient group.