Journal of Personalized Medicine (Jan 2024)

The Role of the <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT in the Management of Patients Suspected of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices’ Infection

  • Antonio Rosario Pisani,
  • Dino Rubini,
  • Corinna Altini,
  • Rossella Ruta,
  • Maria Gazzilli,
  • Angela Sardaro,
  • Francesca Iuele,
  • Nicola Maggialetti,
  • Giuseppe Rubini

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14010065
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 1
p. 65

Abstract

Read online

Background: Infection of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDI) is a real public health problem. The main aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of CIEDI. Methods: A total of 48 patients, who performed 18F-FDG PET/CT for the clinical suspicion of CIEDI were retrospectively analyzed; all patients were provided with a model with procedural recommendations before the exam. Sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and diagnostic accuracy (DA) of 18F-FDG PET/CT were calculated; the reproducibility of qualitative analysis was assessed with Cohen’s κ test. The semi-quantitative parameters (SUVmax, SQR and TBR) were evaluated in CIEDI+ and CIEDI− patients using the Student’ t-test; ROC curves were elaborated to detect cut-off values. The trend of image quality with regards to procedural recommendation adherence was evaluated. Results: Se, Sp, PPV, NPV and DA were respectively 96.2%, 81.8%, 86.2%, 94.7% and 89.6%. The reproducibility of qualitative analysis was excellent (K = 0.89). Semiquantitative parameters resulted statistically different in CIEDI+ and CIEDI− patients. Cut-off values were SUVmax = 2.625, SQR = 3.766 and TBR = 1.29. Trend curves showed increasing image quality due to adherence to procedural recommendations. Conclusions: 18F-FDG-PET/CT is a valid tool in the management of patients suspected of CIEDI and adherence to procedural recommendations improves its image quality.

Keywords