Cancer Reports (Feb 2024)

Exploring the intratumoral heterogeneity of DNA ploidy in prostate cancer

  • Tatjana Vlajnic,
  • David C. Müller,
  • Christian Ruiz,
  • René Schönegg,
  • Hans‐Helge Seifert,
  • George N. Thalmann,
  • Tobias Zellweger,
  • Clémentine Le Magnen,
  • Cyrill A. Rentsch,
  • Lukas Bubendorf

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1953
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 2
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Prostate cancer is morphologically and molecularly heterogeneous. Genomic heterogeneity might be mirrored by variability in DNA ploidy. Aneuploidy is a hallmark of genomic instability and associated with tumor aggressiveness. Little attention has been paid to the biological significance of the diploid tumor cell population that often coexists with aneuploid populations. Here, we investigated the role of DNA ploidy in tumor heterogeneity and clonal evolution. Methods Three radical prostatectomy specimens with intratumoral heterogeneity based on nuclear features on H&E were selected. DNA content of each subpopulation was determined by DNA image cytometry and silver in situ hybridization (SISH). Genomic evolution was inferred from array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). Additionally, immunohistochemistry was used to examine the stemness‐associated marker ALDH1A1. Results Nuclear morphology reliably predicted DNA ploidy status in all three cases. In one case, aCGH analysis revealed several shared deletions and one amplification in both the diploid and the aneuploid population, suggesting that these populations could be related. In the other two cases, a statement about relatedness was not possible. Furthermore, ALDH1A1 was expressed in 2/3 cases and exclusively observed in their diploid populations. Conclusions In this proof‐of‐concept study, we demonstrate the feasibility to predict the DNA ploidy status of distinct populations within one tumor by H&E morphology. Future studies are needed to further investigate the clonal relationship between the diploid and the aneuploid subpopulation and test the hypothesis that the aneuploid population is derived from the diploid one. Finally, our analyses pointed to an enrichment of the stemness‐associated marker ALDH1A1 in diploid populations, which warrants further investigation in future studies.

Keywords