Alzheimer’s Research & Therapy (Oct 2024)

Plasma lipidomic signatures of dementia with Lewy bodies revealed by machine learning, and compared to Alzheimer's disease

  • Huixin Shen,
  • Yueyi Yu,
  • Jing Wang,
  • Yuting Nie,
  • Yi Tang,
  • Miao Qu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-024-01585-7
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 1
pp. 1 – 14

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB) is a complex neurodegenerative disorder that often overlaps clinically with Alzheimer’s disease (AD), presenting challenges in accurate diagnosis and underscoring the need for novel biomarkers. Lipidomic emerges as a promising avenue for uncovering disease-specific metabolic alterations and potential biomarkers, particularly as the lipidomics landscape of DLB has not been previously explored. We aim to identify potential diagnostic biomarkers and elucidate the disease's pathophysiological mechanisms. Methods This study conducted a lipidomic analysis of plasma samples from patients with DLB, AD, and healthy controls (HCs) at Xuanwu Hospital. Untargeted plasma lipidomic profiling was conducted via liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. Machine learning methods were employed to discern lipidomic signatures specific to DLB and to differentiate it from AD. Results The study enrolled 159 participants, including 57 with AD, 48 with DLB, and 54 HCs. Significant differences in lipid profiles were observed between the DLB and HC groups, particularly in the classes of sphingolipids and phospholipids. A total of 55 differentially expressed lipid species were identified between DLB and HCs, and 17 between DLB and AD. Correlations were observed linking these lipidomic profiles to clinical parameters like Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale III (UPDRS III) and cognitive scores. Machine learning models demonstrated to be highly effective in distinguishing DLB from both HCs and AD, achieving substantial accuracy through the utilization of specific lipidomic signatures. These include PC(15:0_18:2), PC(15:0_20:5), and SPH(d16:0) for differentiation between DLB and HCs; and a panel includes 13 lipid molecules: four PCs, two PEs, three SPHs, two Cers, and two Hex1Cers for distinguishing DLB from AD. Conclusions This study presents a novel and comprehensive lipidomic profile of DLB, distinguishing it from AD and HCs. Predominantly, sphingolipids (e.g., ceramides and SPHs) and phospholipids (e.g., PE and PC) were the most dysregulated lipids in relation to DLB patients. The lipidomics panels identified through machine learning may serve as effective plasma biomarkers for diagnosing DLB and differentiating it from AD dementia.

Keywords