Arctic Science (Oct 2024)

Snow as an Indicator of Atmospheric Transport of Anthropogenic Particles (Microplastics and Microfibers) from Urban to Arctic Regions

  • Jasmine Thea Yu,
  • Miriam Diamond,
  • Eric Ward,
  • Jennifer Adams,
  • Amaya Cherin-Hall,
  • Mary Gamberg,
  • Tyler Obediah,
  • Michael Palmer,
  • Andrew Platt,
  • Cassandra Worthy,
  • Sarah Finkelstein,
  • Liisa Jantunen

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2024-0045

Abstract

Read online

We report anthropogenic particles (AP) > 100μm, including microplastics and microfibers, from 70 surface snow samples collected from the urban Greater Toronto Area (GTA), remote and sparsely inhabited regions in the Yukon and Northwest Territories, and the unpopulated high Arctic. Concentrations and proportions of particles of anthropogenic origin were conservatively estimated after blank and ‘anthropogenic origin’ corrections were performed based on visual analysis and micro-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (µFTIR). AP were dominated by microfibers (95-100%), with variable concentrations across and within regions. Microfibers were distinguished as synthetic, regenerated semi-synthetic, anthropogenically modified cellulosic, and natural cellulosic or proteinaceous. Among microfibers with confirmed anthropogenic origin, most were polyester/PET (8-22%) and semi-synthetic rayon (1-18%), with anthropogenic cellulose comprising a small proportion (3-7%) across all regional areas. Greater diversity of coloured non-fibrous particles (fragments, films and foams) in settled regions (i.e., GTA and Carcross, Yukon) suggests direct input from local sources. Back trajectory analyses performed for days leading up to sample collection showed high frequency transport (>10%) from population centres exceeding 200km distance. Our findings of APs in snow from uninhabited areas support the hypothesis that APs, especially microfibers, undergo long-range atmospheric transport whereby snow can scavenge and deposit APs in remote northern regions.